Thanks for your unexpected suggestion. You may have a point.
While you await input, however, I would appreciate it if you would be
more specific about what you find inappropriate or inefficient about my
conversation with Bob.
Naturally, since it deals with the nature and operation of
constructivism,I had thought it was quite relevant. Perhaps you feel
list conversation should focus more on the particulars of PCP
technology?
I certainly could understand it if you did, although I still would
disagree.
RSVP?
Gary
FIONN STEVENSON wrote:
>
> Dear Gary and Bob
>
> Is the undernoted not best conducted through a personal dialogue
> rather than the discussion group? I think time with the group is
> precious -we all get so much e-mail now.....
> lets use the group for groupwork......what do others think ? Am I out
> of order here, or is this a real issue ?
>
> With best wishes
>
> Fionn Stevenson
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%