Re: Introduction

RASKINJ@HARPO.TNSTATE.EDU
Wed, 11 Oct 1995 13:57:07 -0600 (CST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Previous message: Travis Gee: "Spam"
Next message: Joel Philp: "Re: Grids with children"
Maybe in reply to: John Saringer: "Introduction"
Next in thread: anima@devi.demon.co.uk: "re: Introduction"

> What puzzles me the tiniest bit about this debate over awareness of
>how one's approach might be totally wrong is what the heck is the big
>deal. I'd always thought this awareness came automatically with the
>territory of ANY scholarly or 'scientific' endeavour at all - at least
>except when actually engaged in presenting reports to clients in
>commissioned consultant-research.
> Harry Oxley

For some reason this reminded me unavoidably of Captain Kirk's Top Ten
Reasons for Violating the Prime Directive. Reference not to hand, but
available to the curious.

Bill Ramsay

BILL--THANKS FOR THE HELPFUL STAR TREK REFERENCE! Capt. Kirk never did seem
to fully grasp the concept of constructive alternativism. Sometimes Kirk
really needed Spock to give him a "zetz" right in the head!

Jonathan D. Raskin, Ph.D.
Dept. of Psychology
Tennessee State University
3500 John A. Merritt Blvd.
Nashville, TN 37209-1561
(615) 963-5158
e-mail: raskinj@HARPO.TNSTATE.EDU

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Previous message: Travis Gee: "Spam"
Next message: Joel Philp: "Re: Grids with children"
Maybe in reply to: John Saringer: "Introduction"
Next in thread: anima@devi.demon.co.uk: "re: Introduction"