Just to keep you up do date:
Do doubt you have identified my blunder on the rater Q (that's what
happens when things are done in a rush) . I thought I had gotten
away with it on the first batch when I did not hear from yourself or
Frank, but not to be. It doesn't seem to have caused too much of a
problem, apart from causing a decline in my
subjective well being and raised anxiety symptoms! My social
functioning wasn't affected tho'!! I sent out 48 Qs in total (each item being rated by 8
persons) So far I have received 23; I'm hoping for a glut over the
weekend, fingers crossed.
We have started the data entry on the rater Qs. Not as easy as it
sounds with everybody receiving different ones. I think I have it
sussed. I am entering it onto Excel spreadsheet, sorting by the
original random numbers. Each question (ie biased, clear, state,
trait etc) is being entered on a different sheet. I will then have
to rotate the spreadsheets so the item measures run along the top. I
will then have to keep each set of 106 separate as they will each have
been rated by a different mix of clinical and non clinical etc. If
you or Frank have any thoughts on the data analysis and how this
affects the data entry let me know. We need to discuss who's doing
what.
Chris: The data entry on the measures is almost complete, I have just one
site to go (phew). Nawal is back next week. She can do her stuff and you
should receive everything by Wed/Thurs.
=============== M.H.F. Core Battery Study ==============================
This message was redistributed by the MHF study list:
mhf_study@psyctc.sghms.ac.uk
If you have technical problems with this message or the list, reply to:
Chris Evans <C.Evans@sghms.ac.uk>
The list is archived for WWW browsing at:
http://psyctc.sghms.ac.uk/mhf_study/list/index.htm
User name: Core_Battery Password: Duracell (both case sensitive)